Two divisions, two languages and a promotion playoff that connects them. The structure is the reason a generic league collector produces gaps here.
ScrapeIt runs the collection as a managed service. You choose the divisions, seasons and languages; we build the pipeline against the structured layer where it is available, run the backfill once and the in season updates around matchdays, and hand back CSV, JSON, Excel or a push into your warehouse, with both name forms kept and division movement recorded explicitly.
Cadence in season is matchday driven, which keeps it cheap. Fixtures are known in advance, tables move after matches and statistics settle shortly after.
We read structured responses rather than driving a browser across rendered pages, and we pace what we send. Competition data is a compilation with rights attached and the site carries terms on automated collection and reuse, so the dataset is built for analysis and internal product use rather than republication. If your use case touches betting or public redistribution, take it to your own counsel before the project starts.
Fixture and result records cover division, season, matchday, match identifier, home and away club, kickoff in local time and UTC, stadium, attendance where published, half time and full time score, and status.
Table records carry division, season, matchday, position, club, played, won, drawn, lost, goals for and against, goal difference and points, stored per matchday rather than only as a final standing.
Match detail covers goals with scorer, assist and minute, cards, substitutions, and the team statistics the league publishes, which on this competition includes the distance and sprint measures that German football reports more consistently than most leagues do.
Club and player records carry identifiers, names in both languages, nationality, position, shirt number, date of birth, and season aggregates for appearances, minutes, goals, assists and cards.
Division movement is captured explicitly: which clubs were promoted, relegated or went through the playoff, and in which season. Without that a multi season club history is a set of disconnected fragments, and reconstructing it afterwards from table positions alone is unreliable.
The relegation playoff is a small structure with an outsized effect on data quality. Two clubs from different divisions meet over two legs, and the result determines which division each plays in next season. Collected as ordinary fixtures they are orphans belonging to neither table; typed properly they close the loop between divisions.
Historical depth is good and, as always in sports, immutable once collected. A multi season panel across both divisions is a one time backfill, after which the in season feed is light: matchday plus a settle window.
Cross league joins are the usual extension. Clients comparing German clubs with English or Spanish ones need club and player identity normalised across sources and languages, which is the same entity work described on our other sports pages and the reason those pages exist as a set rather than in isolation.
Valuation and transfer data joins here naturally too. Squad lists from the official source and market values from a transfer database, matched on player identity, answer whether a promoted club actually invested or simply survived on the squad that came up.
The official Bundesliga site covers the top division and the second division together, in German and in English, with fixtures, tables, match centres, club pages, squads and player statistics for both.
The two division structure is not a detail. Promotion and relegation move clubs between them every season, and a relegation playoff connects the divisions directly. A dataset that collects only the top flight loses half of any club's history the moment it goes down, and any longitudinal analysis of a club that has moved between divisions will have holes in it that look like missing data rather than a structural choice.
The bilingual publishing matters for entity handling. Club and player names render differently between the German and English editions, and the German forms carry umlauts that appear transliterated in URLs but not in body text. Collecting one language and joining it to a source using the other is where a great many club matching errors originate.
Like most modern league sites this one renders from structured data rather than serving static documents, which makes the collection design the same as elsewhere: read the structured layer where it is available, render pages only where necessary, keep the request count low.
Get a Quote
Developers
Customers worldwide
Pages extracted
Hours saved for our clients
€199 / one-time
setup fee - included
€169 / mo
setup fee €499
€229 / mo
setup fee €499
€349 / mo
setup fee €499
€549 / mo
setup fee €799
The instinct is to collect the top division because that is where the attention is. It produces a dataset that breaks for exactly the clubs whose stories are most interesting, and it breaks silently.
A club relegated at the end of a season simply stops appearing. Its next season exists, in the second division, and if that division is not collected the club looks as if it ceased to exist and then reappeared two years later with different numbers. Any analysis of squad value, attendance or performance across a relegation is impossible, and those are precisely the periods people want to analyse.
Because both divisions and the playoff sit on the same site, collecting them together costs marginally more and produces a continuous history. Division movement is recorded as its own fact rather than inferred, so a club's trajectory reads as one line.
The second reason to be here is language. German football coverage is substantially German language, and a dataset built only from English renderings will mismatch clubs and players against German sources. Collecting both editions and keeping both name forms is what makes those joins work, and it costs almost nothing once the pipeline exists.
The third is the statistics. This competition publishes running and sprint measures more consistently than most, and for anyone doing performance work that is a reason to prefer the official source over an aggregator that drops them.
Learn how to use web scraping to solve data problems for your organization
Leveraging advances in technology, the AI-powered web scraper has skyrocketed in demand and is helping to expand capabilities by automating tedious daily tasks and speeding up data collection from thousands of websites several times over.
Web scraping is a method of obtaining web data by extracting it from pages of web resources with the help of a program, that is, in automatic mode. It is used to syntactically convert web pages into more usable forms.
If you specialize in machine learning, you need to feed large amounts of data to the algorithms. Web scraping is the easiest and the most efficient method of collecting the data from all over the Internet.
ScrapeIt is a managed extraction company, not a tool you have to learn. Our team builds the pipeline, watches it through the season and across the promotion and relegation cycle, and repairs it before matchday.
You see a sample first, in your format, across the divisions and seasons you actually need, including a club that has moved between divisions so you can see the history stays continuous.
Because otherwise your dataset breaks silently for every relegated club. The club stops appearing, then returns two years later with different numbers, and any analysis across the relegation is impossible. Both divisions and the playoff sit on the same site, so collecting them together costs little and produces a continuous history.
Both, when it matters, and it usually does. Club and player names render differently between editions, and German forms carry umlauts that appear transliterated in URLs but not in body text. Keeping both name forms is what allows the data to join against German language sources without mismatching clubs.
Yes, for both divisions. A final table says who won; a table per matchday shows when the season turned. Reconstructing that later from results alone is unreliable, particularly where points deductions apply, and storing it as you go costs nothing.
Yes, and it is a common pairing. Official squad lists on one side and market values on the other, joined on normalised player identity, answer whether a promoted club actually invested or simply carried the squad that came up. The join needs careful player matching, which we handle during collection.
As its own fixture type linking the two divisions. Collected as ordinary matches those ties are orphans belonging to neither table; typed correctly they close the loop and make a club's division history read as one continuous line rather than as fragments.
Step 1 - Make a Request
You share your needs, expectations, and desired timeframe. We’ll suggest the best solution based on your request and budget.
Step 2 - Configuring Custom Web Crawlers
Our specialists configure the crawlers and extract a sample dataset for your review before proceeding with the full-scale extraction.
Step 3 - Collect and Deliver
Once you approve the sample, we launch the project and start full data collection. We gather, filter, and structure the data for easy use, delivering it on time in your preferred format.
Step 4 - Maintain and Support
Our team manages ongoing processes, monitors website changes, and supports all data extraction cycles. We can also help integrate data into your systems or create dashboards to simplify analysis.
Scrapeit Sp. z o.o.
10/208 Legionowa str., 15-099, Bialystok, Poland
NIP: 5423457175
REGON: 523384582
