Japan Times Scraper for English-Language Japan Reporting

This is Japan reported in English for a foreign readership. Useful, and a fraction of what Japan publishes, chosen by someone with a foreign reader in mind.

Plans from €169 a month · Free project assessment · Reply within 1 business day

CSV · Excel · JSON · XML · FTP · SFTP · Amazon S3 · Google Cloud

japantimes.co.jp
Japan Times Scraper for English-Language Japan Reporting
japantimes.co.jpwhat you get
Typical fields for news sites
headlinesectionauthorpublished_aturlbody_text
Delivery

API, JSON feed or CSV, XLSX and JSON files

Schedule

One-time, monthly, weekly, daily or 3 times a day

Managed Japan coverage data, run end to end by us

  1. You send

    The Japan Times pages, filters, fields and a schedule

  2. We run the scrapers

    Built, monitored and repaired by our team

  3. You receive the data

    API, JSON feed or CSV, XLSX and JSON files

ScrapeIt runs the collection as a managed service. You name the sections or topics; we build the pipeline with agency credit separated from byline, romanisation conventions preserved, access level on every row, and hand back CSV, JSON, Excel or a push into your warehouse.

Where a brief needs the Japanese-language market we scope that as additional and harder work rather than letting an English corpus stand in for it.

We collect published content only and do not circumvent subscriptions. We collect only publicly available data - everything a visitor can see on The Japan Times - and we collect it legally.

Japan Times fields in every export

Article records carry the headline, standfirst, publication and update timestamps, section, topic tags, author or agency credit, word count, access level and the address.

Agency credit is kept separate from byline. A substantial share of any English-language national paper's coverage originates with wire agencies, and a corpus that counts wire copy as original reporting overstates the newsroom's output and double counts stories that also appear elsewhere.

Japanese names and terms are recorded as published, with the romanisation convention noted where it can be determined. Name order and transliteration vary, and a dataset that silently normalises them loses the ability to match against Japanese-language sources later.

Access level is recorded since subscription and open content both appear.

Every row carries the collection timestamp and a revision count where re-collection shows the article changed.

Japan Times fields in every export
Selection analysis, wire share and limits

Selection analysis, wire share and limits

Selection analysis - comparing which stories appear in English against what the Japanese-language press covered - is the most valuable output and requires a second source. We scope it as such rather than implying one outlet can answer it.

Wire share measurement is available from this source alone and is often surprising to clients: the proportion of agency copy in international coverage of any country tends to be higher than people expect.

Framing analysis for an international readership supports investor relations and market entry work, where the question is what a foreign decision-maker is likely to have read.

Limits: subscription content stays behind its subscription with access level recorded. And this is one English outlet in a market whose main voices publish in Japanese, which is the sentence we put at the top of every scoping conversation here.

An English window onto a Japanese-language market

Source
japantimes.co.jp
Category
news sites
Delivery
API, JSON feed, CSV, XLSX
Plans
From €169 a month
Get a quote

The Japan Times is Japan's oldest English-language daily, covering national news, business, politics, culture and sport for a readership that largely does not read Japanese.

Its usefulness as a data source comes with a scope condition that has to be stated first. Japan's news market is overwhelmingly Japanese-language, with national dailies whose circulation dwarfs any English outlet. An English-language paper is a selection from that market, made with a foreign audience in mind, and it is not a sample of Japanese news in any statistical sense.

That does not make it less valuable - it makes it valuable for different questions. What reaches an international audience, how Japanese events are framed in English, and what a foreign business reader is told are real questions that this source answers directly and that the Japanese-language press cannot.

Section pages respond with substantial content, and everything they and the article pages show can be collected: headline, standfirst, section, topic tags, byline or agency credit, and both timestamps.

25Developers
500+Customers
1.5BPages extracted
15,000+Hours saved for our clients

The Japan Times scraping plans and pricing

Airplane

€199one-time

Setup fee included

100,000
One-time
Up to 5 days
7 days

Helicopter

€169/ mo

Setup fee €499

250,000
Monthly
Up to 5 days
14 days

Glasses

€229/ mo

Setup fee €499

1,000,000
Weekly
Up to 5 days
30 days

Microscope popular

€349/ mo

Setup fee €499

2,000,000
Daily
Same day
60 days

DNA

€549/ mo

Setup fee €799

3,000,000
3 times daily
Same day
90 days

Delivery: CSV, JSON or XLSX files, our API or a JSON feed. MCP server on request.

Full plan details

Why the English selection is the finding, not a limitation

Briefs about Japanese media often start from English sources because they are readable, and the risk is that the resulting dataset gets described as Japanese news coverage. It is not, and saying so early avoids a conclusion built on a wrong premise.

Treated correctly, the selection itself is the interesting variable. Which domestic stories are judged worth translating, how much space goes to business versus politics compared with the Japanese press, and how an event is framed for an international readership are all measurable here and genuinely useful to anyone doing market entry, investor communications or international relations work.

The second reason is wire dependence. Separating agency copy from original reporting shows how much of what an international audience reads about Japan is produced in Japan at all, which is a real media structure question.

The third is romanisation. Any project intending to join English coverage to Japanese-language sources needs names in a form that can be matched, and that decision has to be made at collection - once a name has been normalised to one convention the information about which convention the source used is gone.

The fourth is that a complete picture needs Japanese-language sources. We will say so, and scope that as a separate and harder piece of work rather than letting an English corpus stand in for it.

Who builds and keeps your Japan coverage feed

ScrapeIt is a managed extraction company, not a tool you have to learn. Our team builds the pipeline, maintains name handling as conventions shift, and repairs the collector before a coverage series loses the period that mattered.

You see a sample first, in your format, over the sections you actually follow, with wire copy separated so you can see immediately how much of the corpus is original reporting.

FAQ

Still unsure? Write to info@scrapeit.io

Is this a sample of Japanese news?

No, and it is the first thing we say. Japan's news market is overwhelmingly Japanese-language; an English daily is a selection made with foreign readers in mind. It answers different questions well and is not a statistical sample of anything.

Then what is it good for?

What reaches an international audience and how Japanese events are framed in English - directly useful for market entry, investor communications and international relations work, and unanswerable from the Japanese-language press.

Why separate wire copy from staff reporting?

Because counting agency copy as original reporting overstates the newsroom's output and double counts stories appearing elsewhere. The wire share in international coverage of any country is usually higher than clients expect, and it is a real media structure finding.

How do you handle Japanese names?

As published, with the romanisation convention noted where determinable. Name order and transliteration vary, and silently normalising them destroys the ability to match against Japanese-language sources later - a decision that cannot be reversed after collection.

Can you cover the Japanese-language press too?

That is a separate and harder project, and we scope it as one rather than letting an English corpus stand in. If your question is really about Japanese media, we would rather tell you that at the start than deliver something adjacent to it.

How it works

  1. 1

    Make a request

    You share your needs, expectations, and desired timeframe. We'll suggest the best solution based on your request and budget.

  2. 2

    We configure the crawlers

    Our specialists configure the crawlers and extract a sample dataset for your review before proceeding with the full-scale extraction.

  3. 3

    Collect and deliver

    Once you approve the sample, we launch the project and start full data collection. We gather, filter, and structure the data for easy use, delivering it on time in your preferred format.

  4. 4

    Maintain and support

    Our team manages ongoing processes, monitors website changes, and supports all data extraction cycles. We can also help integrate data into your systems or create dashboards to simplify analysis.

Request a quote

Tell us which sites, which fields and how often. A couple of lines is enough to start.

  • We reply within 1 business day
  • A sample dataset before the full run
  • We sign an NDA on request
  • Delivery by API, JSON feed or files
Which sites, which fields, how often. A couple of lines is enough.

This form is protected by Google reCAPTCHA, which loads when you start filling it in. If you prefer not to use it, email us at info@scrapeit.io. Privacy & Cookie Policy

We reply within 1 business day. No obligation.

The Japan Times data from €169/month. Free project assessment, reply within 1 business day.